We found that, in everyday language, native French speakers do not tend to enter into previous participation agreements with Avoir when they are the norm in formal writing. The same goes for reflex verbs. For example, the formal form of this sentence has an earlier correspondence with the direct object: in reality, spokespeople do not tend to add agreements with Avoir in the everyday language. It is probably only by speaking carefully and thinking about the written language that they conclude these agreements by speaking. So, if they don`t read a script, people would usually say: collective nouns (collective nouns), although singular, convey the idea of several entities (a group, a lot…); In the same way, we can refer to a fraction of a group using broken words (half, part of…). In cases such as this, do we decide to conclude the agreement with the collective subcommittee or its complement? The case of ni. neither (ni. or) and /or) is not always clear. In fact, I can only give you a few examples that all seem quite correct to me: to know more about the coherence with the verbs to be and the passive voice.
If a verb has two or more subjects and they all have the same sex, it is the agreement with that sex. If both sexes are present, the correspondence is male. Personally, however, I believe something else; I understand that it is actually the neutral form that is used – and this neutral form is, by chance, exactly the same as the masculine form. It is interesting to note that in Latin, the language from which French comes, the neutral form of the masculine and feminine is different, and their declensions are very close to the declensions of the masculine. This could therefore explain why the male took his place when the neutral sex was lost. Visit this article on Mediapart (in French). The vast majority of French verbs use avoir as an auxiliary and do not correspond to their subjects, as do the verbs to be. However, they require the approval of each previous direct object. Subject pronouns, object pronouns, and all others have different forms for each grammatical person.
The most common reflex verb, in which past participation could change its pronunciation, is whether > it is sitting. In most other common reflex verbs, past participation ends with a vowel. For example, in it`s dressed, the extra -e does not change the pronunciation. Making composite nouns in the plural is a little more complicated. In this case, the leg therefore comes before the verb and thus the past participation is feminine, although the subject, it, is a man. Five types of impersonal pronouns (demonstratively, indeterminate, questioning, negative and possessive) must correspond to the nouns that replace them by sex and number. We could really say that dressed is a feminine plural, because the subject they are feminine plural, or because the direct object is a feminine plural. It makes no difference to the end result. For example, when all subjects express the same idea or express possible choices.
The agreement is concluded with the subject who comes closest to the verb. This is the simplest case. In normal cases (i.e.: Non-reflexive verbs that take the being always correspond to past participation with the subject. So, this also happens when one subject is real and the other for the purposes of comparison or exclusion: then the correspondence with the real subject is. In French, past participations in forms of time and humors must sometimes correspond to another part of the sentence, either with the subject or with the direct object. It is similar to adjectives: If conformity is necessary, you should add e for feminine subjects/objects and s for the plural….