The legal differences between England, Scotland and Northern Ireland are sufficiently confused for British lawyers to confront each other. Follow this advice and your clients will avoid fighting the intricacies of the British Constitution before trying to enforce their contractual rights. the consequences of a total or partial breach, including damage assessment, to the extent that it is subject to legislation; An employment contract is governed by the law of the country in which, or if not, from which the worker usually performs his work in performance of the contract. Parties engaged in intergovernmental and international trade seek to ensure that the rules governing their relations are disadvantaged by the choice of the legal provision. The fact that their choice has effect only with respect to the decision of contractual rights, and not with respect to unauthorized claims seeking to revoke the contract for misrepresentation, would create uncertainty that is exactly to the extent that the parties sought to avoid the choice of the law. In this regard, it should also be noted that the relationship between contractual law and the right to use contracts with respect to the avoidance of contracts because of misrepresentation is extremely complex and cumbersome, even in the law of some jurisdictions. The law on the offences of one state on the law of contracts of another state aggravates this complexity and makes the outcome of disputes less predictable, the type of possibility that a strong commercial law should not promote. Vice-Chancellor Slights` recent decision focused on another aspect of the «clear but thorough» proposal regarding the choice clauses of the laws – whether to ensure that all claims that might arise from the relationship created or linked to the agreement of the parties are governed by the same law. When a dispute arises in compliance with a merger agreement, it is not uncommon for contractual and unauthorized claims to respect that dispute – that is, in addition to allegations that either party has breached the agreement, there may also be claims for fraudulent or negligent misrepresentation, conversion, breach of trust obligation, unlawful interference and other similar claims that do not result from breach of obligations that do not result from breach of obligations. , but on the obligations imposed by the common law of a particular jurisdiction with some connection to the transactions provided for in the agreement.